Last month, the European Union unanimously agreed to extend temporary protection for Ukrainian refugees by another year, until March 4, 2027. On paper, this is excellent news. It ensures continued safety for millions of Ukrainians who fled the Russian invasion and sought shelter in the EU since 2022.
But while the extension is welcome, it also highlights a growing problem:
The lack of long-term solutions.
What is temporary protection?
The Temporary Protection Directive was activated in March 2022, for the first time ever, to respond to the mass influx of displaced people from Ukraine. It allows Ukrainians to:
- Reside legally in the EU
- Access work, healthcare, housing, and education
- Avoid lengthy asylum procedures
For many, this framework has been a lifeline. But it’s still a temporary status, with no long-term perspective and that’s where the trouble begins.
Extension ≠ Stability
Extending protection until 2027 does not provide real security for the future. In fact, the uncertainty can obstruct integration.
Consider:
- Employers who hesitate to offer permanent contracts to someone with a temporary residence status or who avoid hiring them altogether.
- Education programs or vocational training that span several years, which become risky or inaccessible if your legal status is unclear.
- Children who have attended school in an EU country for years but don’t know if they’ll be allowed to stay.
And then there’s the psychological weight:
Living with your bags half-packed.
Always wondering: Will I be sent back next year?
Free movement? Not for them
One critical issue is rarely discussed:
Ukrainians under temporary protection must remain in the country where they registered.
They may travel within the EU, but they cannot settle, work, or study in another Member State.
This creates perverse effects:
- Some EU countries with severe housing shortages must accommodate Ukrainians who actually want to move elsewhere, but legally can’t.
- Meanwhile, other Member States with better job opportunities or housing capacity can’t benefit from the skills and motivation of those willing to come.
It’s not just inefficient, it’s inhumane!
We need an exit strategy with dignity
Polish Interior Minister Tomasz Siemoniak has called for a “gradual phase-out” of the directive once a just peace is achieved. Fair enough, but such an exit strategy must be guided by human dignity, not administrative logic.
We must distinguish between:
- Ukrainians who wish to return home once it’s safe
- Ukrainians who have already put down roots and want to keep contributing to their host country
That requires new legal pathways, not emergency band-aids.
We need a permanent EU-wide framework that allows for:
- Secure residence status
- Full integration
- Freedom of movement
- Transparent transitions from temporary to long-term solutions
Temporary protection saves lives. But it’s not enough.
The directive was an act of European solidarity. It worked.
But it was never meant to last this long and the people who depend on it deserve better than year-to-year extensions.
No one should be forced to live in limbo.
If the EU is serious about standing with Ukraine, we must stop treating 4 million people as if they’re only here “for now.”
They are part of our communities. They are building lives, raising children, paying taxes, contributing to our societies.
It’s time to give them clarity, freedom, and a future.
🟡 What do you think?
Should the EU begin working now on permanent solutions, including freedom of movement, for Ukrainians under temporary protection?
Let me know in the comments or consider sharing this piece to keep the conversation alive.
About the Author
